Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index 2024
An analysis and ranking of 48 pension systems around the world
The Netherlands maintain top spot
The Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index benchmarks 48 retirement income systems around the world, highlighting challenges and opportunities within each. Vietnam was added to the mix this year. We used updated data from the OECD and other international agencies and added some new questions to the integrity sub-index.
The index is made up of three sub-indices, namely adequacy, sustainability and integrity, to measure each retirement income system against more than 50 indicators. This year’s A-grade pension systems are the Netherlands, Iceland, Denmark and Israel.
Each year we include a feature chapter that looks at a topical issue within the pension space. This year we explore how we can help defined contribution members get the best retirement outcomes. Download the report below to discover more about the analysis and your pension system.
This year’s top rated pension systems
Netherlands
Index: 84.8
Rating: A
Iceland
Index: 83.4
Rating: A
Denmark
Index: 81.6
Rating: A
Top three rated systems for each sub-index
-
Adequacy
How much do you get?
1. Netherlands
2. France
3. Uruguay -
Sustainability
Can the system keep delivering?
1. Iceland
2. Denmark
3. Israel -
Integrity
Can the system be trusted?
1. Finland
2. Norway
3. Hong Kong SAR
Overall rating for each pension system
- China [56.5] ▲
- Hong Kong SAR [63.9] ▼
- India [44.0] ▼
- Indonesia [50.2] ▼
- Japan [54.9] ▼
- Korea (South) [52.2] ▲
- Malaysia [56.3] ▲
- Philippines [45.8] ▲
- Singapore [78.7] ▲
- Taiwan [53.7] ▲
- Thailand [50.0] ▲
- Vietnam [54.5]
- Austria [53.4] ▲
- Belgium [68.6]
- Croatia [67.2] ▲
- Denmark [81.6] ▲
- Finland [75.9] ▼
- France [68.0] ▲
- Germany [67.3] ▲
- Iceland [83.4] ▼
- Ireland [68.1] ▼
- Italy [55.4] ▼
- Netherlands [84.8] ▼
- Norway [75.2] ▲
- Poland [56.8] ▼
- Portugal [66.9] ▼
- Spain [63.3] ▲
- Sweden [74.3] ▲
- Switzerland [71.5] ▼
- United Kingdom [71.6] ▼
- Botswana [55.4] ▲
- Israel [80.2] ▼
- Kazakhstan [64.0] ▼
- Saudi Arabia [60.5] ▲
- South Africa [49.6] ▼
- Türkiye [48.3] ▲
- United Arab Emirates [64.8] ▲
- Argentina [45.5] ▲
- Brazil [55.8] ▲
- Chile [74.9] ▲
- Colombia [63.0] ▲
- Mexico [68.5] ▲
- Peru [54.7] ▼
- Uruguay [68.9]
- Australia [76.7] ▼
- New Zealand [68.7] ▲
- Canada [68.4] ▼
- United States of America [60.4] ▼
Feature chapter:
Helping defined contribution members get the best retirement outcome
The transition from defined benefit (DB) to defined contribution (DC) pension plans is occurring at different speeds around the world and often takes decades to fully implement.
According to the OECD, more than 50% of pension assets were held in (occupational) DC plans or personal plans. However, normally DC members do not receive an income from their DC pension plan, which is very different from the traditional DB pension plans. That’s why it’s critical that policies and principles are developed to ensure that retirees from these DC plans receive the best retirement outcome possible.
This chapter examines what pension plans, employers, policy makers and other stakeholders can do to help ensure DC members get the best retirement outcomes. Some of the key considerations are:
- Pension plans must play a critical role in designing the best retirement products.
- A focus on the provision of a regular income during the retirement years (not just a lump sum).
- Offer flexibility in the benefits permitted, including a combination of income and some access to lump sums.
- Cognitive decline during the later years of life must be recognized.
- Build in some protection from future risks such as inflation, market declines and longevity.
- Provide guidance and advice to retirees on the best approach for them.
Meet our lead author and contributors
Before you access this page, please read and accept the terms and legal notices below.
You’re about to enter a website intended for sophisticated, institutional investors and the information contained herein is not intended for investors who are not qualified purchasers as defined in the US Investment Company Act of 1940. Information about Mercer strategies is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute, and should not be construed as, an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, or an offer, invitation or solicitation of any specific products or the investment management services of Mercer, or an offer or invitation to enter into any portfolio management mandate with Mercer.
Mercer makes no representation, and it should not be assumed, that past investment performance is an indication of future results. Moreover, wherever there is the potential for profit there is also the possibility of loss. Any person unable to accept these terms and conditions should not proceed any further. Mercer reserves the right to suspend or withdraw access to any page(s) included on this website without notice at any time and accepts no liability if, for any reason, these pages are unavailable at any time or for any period.