Australian Federal Budget 2024-25: Workforce implications
Workforce skills
From a skills and wages perspective, the Budget has a dual focus: addressing immediate cost-of-living pressures through income tax cuts and subsidies, and supporting wage increases in the aged care and childcare sectors. The unwritten message to most workers could be to not seek further hefty pay rises. There is also debt relief for tertiary students and some means-tested support for some students on compulsory placements.
The Budget highlights the skills needed for ambitious defence, construction, and Future Made in Australia commitments. However, it is unclear how Australia will source these workers amid an ageing population, lower immigration, and constrained international student enrolments. The focus on Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM) skills for future industries might divert resources from critical fields like nursing, aged care, and teaching.
Budget initiatives
Skilling the future workforce
The Future Made in Australia package emphasises investments in renewable energy and defence sectors, focusing on skills development and job creation to future-proof the economy during the energy transition. More than $100 million is allocated to New Energy Apprenticeships and New Energy Skills programs, targeting the growing demand for skilled workers in solar power, renewable hydrogen, and battery energy storage. This initiative aims to bridge the skills gap and prepare the workforce for a green economy. However, there is debate on whether this investment diverts attention from reskilling and upskilling in other productive economic areas.
There is also an ongoing focus in this Budget on building the future workforce to shore up Australia’s defence capabilities. Through a $101.8 million investment over seven years, the Government is focused on building up the workforce to support AUKUS submarines, including apprenticeships and scholarships, specialist welding skills training and $17.2 million to help local defence firms enter the supply chain.
Finally, the Government aims to address housing supply challenges by recruiting thousands of new workers for home construction. Nearly $90 million is allocated to cover education costs for 20,000 young people entering trades, in hopes of boosting a sector in desperate need of more staff.
Reshaping higher education
Unpaid placements
Student debt
Workforce implications
Workforce planning
The Government is facing a complex challenge in future workforce planning, as it must consider various complex and interdependent factors that impact the economy and the labour market, including driving participation of existing workers and building the supply of future workers.
In recent years, the Government has improved workforce participation, especially among women, through enhanced paid parental leave, paid work placements in female-dominated care sectors, and the Building Women’s Careers program. These measures aim to boost productivity and build a modern economy. However, the Budget misses opportunities to reform childcare activity and rebate systems, which would reduce complexity and enhance productivity for existing workers.
While the Government is addressing women's workforce participation, we believe the Budget misses an opportunity for long-term reskilling of the existing workforce. Most initiatives focus on early careers through tertiary education and apprenticeships, supporting future supply. However, our view is that there is a lack of strategic focus on reskilling and retraining the current workforce, especially in areas where productivity is declining, or technology is changing the nature of work.
Skills and the workforce of the future
Pay pressures and internal relativities
The Stage 3 tax cuts, combined with energy and rental subsidies, suggest the Government does not expect unions to seek significant pay rises in the next 12 months. However, pay pressure will likely continue as organisations strive to attract and retain workers, despite a predicted slight increase in unemployment. As cost-of-living pressures ease, some workers may leave second jobs, increasing vacancies in retail, hospitality, and care sectors. Additionally, employers have been paying higher salaries to new hires, creating a significant pay differential between new and current employees, potentially leading to internal pay equity issues.
The Budget did not directly address the gender pay gap (other than pay increases in childcare and aged care which have a large female workforce, and superannuation paid on parental leave). In our opinion it is disappointing that achieving gender pay equity has been overlooked, as it is a complex issue that requires sustained and long-term intervention.
Innovative policy solutions needed
Comprehensive and forward-thinking workforce planning is an area that might be seen as critical yet continues to receive insufficient attention in the Budget. Such planning would anticipate future skills and labour market needs more accurately, ensuring that educational and training programs align closely with future job market demands. This could help mitigate the mismatch between the skills being taught and the skills needed in the economy, thereby enhancing both individual career prospects and national economic performance.
The Budget misses an opportunity to enhance business adoption of technology to boost productivity. It mostly focuses on Australia’s regulatory response to ensure safe and responsible development and deployment of AI. However, with productivity remaining at record lows, despite increased working hours, we believe there is a need for strategic investment in areas that boost the efficiency of knowledge work and the overall output of the economy.
© 2024. All rights reserved. Marsh Pty Ltd ABN 86 004 651 512 ("Marsh"); Mercer (Australia) Pty Ltd ABN 32 005 315 917 (“Mercer”). One International Towers Sydney, 100 Barangaroo Avenue, Sydney NSW 2000.
Marsh and Mercer are businesses of Marsh McLennan [NYSE:MMC] (“MMC”).
This document and any recommendations, analysis, or advice provided by MMC (collectively, the ‘MMC Analysis’) are not intended to be taken as advice regarding any individual situation and should not be relied upon as such. This document contains proprietary, confidential information of MMC and may not be shared with any third party, including other insurance producers, without MMC’s prior written consent.
Any statements concerning actuarial, tax, accounting, or legal matters are based solely on our experience as insurance brokers and risk consultants and are not to be relied upon as actuarial, accounting, tax, or legal advice, for which you should consult your own professional advisors.
Any modelling, analytics, or projections are subject to inherent uncertainty, and the MMC Analysis could be materially affected if any underlying assumptions, conditions, information, or factors are inaccurate or incomplete or should change. The information contained herein is based on sources we believe reliable, but we make no representation or warranty as to its accuracy. Except as may be set forth in an agreement between you and MMC, MMC shall have no obligation to update the MMC Analysis and shall have no liability to you or any other party with regard to the MMC Analysis or to any services provided by a third party to you or MMC.
Marsh makes no representation or warranty concerning the application of policy wordings or the financial condition or solvency of insurers or re-insurers. Marsh makes no assurances regarding the availability, cost, or terms of insurance coverage.
This document is general in nature only and does not constitute an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell securities, commodities and/or any other financial instruments or products or constitute a solicitation on behalf of any of the investment managers (including Funds managed by Mercer), their affiliates, products or strategies that Mercer may evaluate or recommend. This document is not intended to be, nor should be construed as, financial product advice. It does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. You should therefore consult a financial adviser before making any investment decision.