Colorado high court bans use-it-or-lose-it vacation policies
Colorado vacation forfeiture policy prohibited
The case arose from a terminated employee denied payout of her earned, accrued vacation. The employer relied on its policy, which stated that any employee discharged or voluntarily separated without two weeks’ written notice would not receive payout of unused, accrued vacation time.
The Colorado Wage Act (CWA) generally defines wages and compensation as “earned, vested, and determinable.” The law expressly includes “vacation pay” as a type of protected wage or compensation. However, the employer argued that the CWA doesn’t apply in this case because the earned but unused vacation time never vested in light of the policy’s forfeiture provision. Both the trial court and the appeals court agreed, finding the forfeiture permissible.
Agency action
Final ruling
Colorado vacation regulation
In accordance with CDLE wage protection rule 2.17, forfeiture of earned vacation is impermissible, but employers’ vacation agreements with Colorado employees may contain the following provisions:
- Whether the employee will receive any vacation pay at all
- How much vacation pay per year or other period the employee will earn
- Whether vacation pay will accrue all at once or proportionally each week, month, or other period
- Whether a cap of one year’s worth (or more) applies to vacation pay accruals
As a result, employers may have policies that cap employees’ vacation pay at a year’s worth of accruals or some other accrual limit, but cannot require forfeiture of any of the accruals earned.
Vacation pay defined
Employer takeaways
States have different positions on whether vacation and PTO policies must provide for payout at termination or can include a use-it-or-lose-it provision. Some states require payout of unused, accrued vacation unless the employer’s written policy and consistent practice in administering that policy clearly indicate when forfeiture of accruals may occur. Businesses that want to curtail accruals in states that ban use-it-or-lose-it provisions may want to explore capping accruals. For example, a policy could limit accruals to 80 hours so employees hitting that limit can’t accrue additional time before using some.
The following approaches may guide employers’ vacation policy designs:
- Determine the law of the state where employees work, regardless of where they reside
- Decide on a carryover provision, where permitted
- Consider a cap on accruals in states that don’t allow a use-it-or-lose-it provision
- Develop a written PTO or vacation policy detailing how time is accrued and what employees can do with the accrued time
- Provide clear employee communications on the policy’s terms (consider including in the employee handbook)
- Changes accrual and usage terms only on a prospective basis
- Do not forfeit any accrued vacation or PTO except as permitted by state law and outlined in the written policy and other employee-facing communications
- Establish a process for consistent administration of the policy, including calculation of accrued time and payment, if applicable
Non-Mercer resources
- Nieto v. Clark's Market, Inc., 2021 CO 48 (June 14, 2021)
- Colorado Wage Act (CO Rev. Stat § 8-4-101 et seq.)
- 7 CO Code Regs. § 1103-7-2.17 (effective Jan. 1, 2023)
- Statement of basis, purpose, specific statutory authority and findings for updated wage protection rules (CO Division of Labor Standards and Statistics, Nov. 10, 2021)
- 7 CO Code Regs. § 1103-7-2.17 (effective April 14, 2021)
Mercer Law & Policy resources
- Roundup: State accrued paid leave mandates (Oct. 25, 2023)
- State laws limit vacation forfeitures (April 14, 2023)